how Jumper 2.0 and an Internet culture helped educators teach and students learn.
A small charter school in North Carolina was unhappy with the quality of search results. All too often the results pages were littered
with links that were useless in the classroom - or worse.
Using public search engines had become a mundane part of their student's lives. They used the web for everything from researching
papers to finding videos, they rarely give it much thought. Enter some word or phrase, and the search engine cranked out a long
list of results. They may not be the results you’re looking for, but you still got something.
The problem was that students were spending a significant portion of their computer time looking for relevant, accurate information.
Yet, they usually failed to find the information they needed. Teachers knew the value of search to their curriculum but had no solution
to guide and direct students searches to the best information. But what if those search results pages were generated by people -
educators and students in particular - rather than by complex algorithms?
We use these tools every day, but most of us don’t consider what’s going on under the hood. Typically, search engines are powered by
complex mathematical algorithms. Automated software programs that represent a one-size fits all approach to search. They lack the
dexterity and the intelligence that people deliver to search results. People can provide the context, meaning, and value that we crave
in search results. Even the best algorithm is not as good as a human being at interpreting the content or data.
What they found was Jumper 2.0. Their students took to it instantly. Now both teachers and students are empowered to share and connect their
interests and expertise with classmates - effortlessly. Instead of looking at long lists of search results with no context, students
are shown the results that their teachers and friends have bookmarked and tagged. And to build on the information that others have found
useful. Every bookmark multiplies the sources of information, makes collaboration with peers simple, turns tacit knowledge and interests
explicit, and allows information to discovered and connected naturally and effortlessly among people whose work and information interests
overlap.